Skip to main content

INEQUALITY SPOILS DEMOCRACY

INEQUALITY SPOILS DEMOCRACY

Although democracy is claimed the best form of governance as it's not only a form of governance but it's also a way of life, a value system and moral principle guiding human dignity. But the hard reality is that democracy can never be ensured by rule books and political governments. Rather it's the level of inequality within the society and across the societies which decide how much democracy is possible or whether  democracy is possible at all. If the level of inequality and inequity is high probability of democracy is low and this is so vicious that level of democracy in tern determines how much inequality and inequity exists in a society and across societies. Political freedom is very important, in fact essential but this is not a guarantee for allivation of inequality and inequity and democracy. 
         Political freedom consists of the factors among which democracy has very important place. In a politically free country there is no certainty that people of that country are also free to live their life as standard sets of rules. Their freedom is decided by the democratic rights which they have and which they use practically. But for enjoying those democratic rights it's essential that the inequality and inequity among people of the country are kept at lowest level. If this is not so unequal people can't enjoy democratic rights equally. This is very simple arithmetic and is measurable on a scale. Political freedom is a deceiving concept because most people though feel they are free as they can chose their government as per their rule but in reality they don't do so as their level of inequality shape their involvement in the political process for choosing their government. Further , choosing a government is just one democratic -political right among many others which people don't even think that they exist at all.
       In the era of rapid technological improvements in which we live and our progeny will have to live rapid change and improvements are needed and for makin skill development tuned with technological progress we need readily available educational and training resources. This exercise of  continuous upgradation needs sufficient amount of money in pocket and abundant educational and training institutions. If either is less we can't upgrade. Further scarcity of one makes the other scarce. If we have less than required  money we can't opt of upgradation and this will make us redundant in the field of economic activities and will be a liability for the system making the system weak and fragile. On the other hand if educational resources are scarce only a few are able to get into and upgrade themselves which again leave many as redundant and  useless.  If the system responds poorly those who have no money to be upgraded and trained are either left out or they have to opt for low standard institutes making them under skilled. In any case inequality in income or resources deepen inequality further and only a handful.who are rich earlier have chance to move upward.
     If this inequality and inequity continue to grow more and more people remain either unemployed or underemployed . Their bargaing capacity deciles more and more. Such people are not in a position to claim their democratic rights which are written in rule books. Neither are they able to challange the unequal rich . This situation enables richer or well to do sections to claim all important jobs, including jobs of politicians and jobs of arbitrators. Thus inequality fill the structure of power with those who are unequally higher.
     In a society who are technologically more well and advanced trained have higher capacity to bargain and to earn. They have higher social status as well. But for achieving this status and income well to do background is needed. Since facilities for such education are scarce or very small only boys and girls from a sound background compete for this. On the other hand those who are not so sound and who are in majority are left behind and have to be satisfied with lower quality of education and this makes them capable of only low paid or poorly paid jobs. Thus inequality perpetuates inequality, inequality breeds inequality. In a society where every one has no chance to get equal training for his or her  future such losers fall behind in claiming their democratic rights. In such a situation though theoretically rights are available to all, all are equal before law, all have equal opportunity to compete in reality they are decided in unequal boundaries and such boundaries are more difficult to be crossed than any international physical boundary.
 This continuing inequality and inequity are manifested in child rearing, standard of life, level of attained education, healthcare facilities, social relationship and all other walks of life . But one more impact which is not even considered by the sufferers themselves is the dignity of life as a whole. The entire edifice of democracy rests on the plateform of human dignity which is paramount. Inequality and inequity diminish the chance for unequally low person to enjoy a dignified life for which democracy is being accepted as a model for governance. Politically that person lives in a free nation but his/her own life is not free enough to avail the fruits of a dignified life. If democracy fails to provide her followers a dignified life then democracy is nothing but a form of governance adopted by those who had already  access to  resources of society including resource of power. Thus in a society  with  marked inequality democracy becomes self defeating. No amount of  rules and regulations and ideologies can save such democracy from become oligarchy. Symbolism in name of democracy and  rhetoric can't build democracy.

Popular posts from this blog

SHRIMADBHAGAVAD GEETA CHAPTER 2 SHLOKA 47

गीता अध्याय 2 श्लोक 47 ----------------------------------- कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन।  मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भुर्मा ते संगोऽस्त्वकर्मणि॥ तेरा कर्म करने में ही अधिकार है, उसके फलों में कभी नहीं। इसलिए तू कर्मों के फल हेतु मत हो तथा तेरी कर्म न करने में भी आसक्ति न हो  ॥47॥ कर्मपथ की सावधानियों और विशेषताओं को बताते हुए श्रीकृष्ण इस पथ के सम्बंध में समझाये हैं कि अन्तिम लक्ष्य तो साँख्य बुद्धि को प्राप्त करना है लेकिन उस तक पहुंचने का मार्ग योग है, कर्मपथ है। इस पथ को ध्यान पूर्वक समझना और उसका अभ्यास करना बहुत जरूरी है तभी हम साँख्य और उसके पश्चात परमब्रह्म को प्राप्त कर सकते हैं। इसके अतिरिक्त कोई और रास्ता नहीं है जो हमारेके कल्याण का मार्ग प्रशस्त कर सके।        श्रीकृष्ण समझते हुए कहते हैं कि कर्म ही वो मार्ग है जिसपर हम चलकर के परम नैष्कर्म्य की स्थिति तक पहुँच सकते हैं लेकिन जब हम कर्म करते हैं तो उस कर्म की विशेषता और सावधानियों को समझना अनिवार्य है अन्यथा हम कर्मपथ से भटक जाते हैं।       ये विशेषताएँ और सावधानियाँ निम्नवत हैं----- 1....

श्रीमद्भागवत गीता-प्रवेशिका से सारांश तक

श्रीमद्भागवत गीता-प्रवेशिका से सारांश तक-- श्रीमद्भागवत गीता की शुरुआत महाभारत का युद्ध वास्तविक रूप से शूरु होने के ठीक पहले होती है और इसके अंत के साथ युद्ध प्रारम्भ होता है। तो क्या गीता युद्ध को उकसाने वाला ग्रंथ है?      इस प्रश्न का उत्तर द्वितीय अध्याय की शुरुआत में ही मिल जाता है। प्रथम अध्याय के अंत में अर्जुन हथियार डाल देता है, साफ साफ मना कर देता है कि वो अपने अंग्रजो, अनुजों, गुरुओं, बंधुओं से नहीं लड़ेगा।।सनद रहे वो डरा नहीं था, उसे  विषाद  हो गया था, वो डिप्रेशन में चला गया था। उस समय उसे उकसाने का सबसे सरल तरीका क्या  हो सकता था? कृष्ण उसे जुआ यानी चौसर की सभा याद दिलाते, द्रौपदी का वस्त्रहरण याद दिलाते, लाक्षागृह याद दिलाते, वनवास के दिन याद दिलाते। तब ज्यादा सम्भावना थी कि अर्जुन हिंसक हो कर युद्ध के लिए ततपर हो उठता। लेकिन तब अर्जुन हिंसक होता, उसमें और कौरवों में कोई फर्क नहीं रह जाता। जैसे को तैसा होता । लेकिन कृष्ण ने उसे आत्मा की अजरता, कर्तव्यबोध, धर्म, कर्म के विषय में बताया। एक बार भी प्रतिशोध की आग नहीं भड़काई उन्होंने, बल्कि उसे सत...
It's a hard fact that more than common masses it's the elite, which ditches idea of India as enshrined in the Indian National Movement and in  the  Indian  Constitution. Role of the judiciaal elite in this context has been more objectionable considering the weight of onus she has to carry to carry on the democracy.     It's the elite which sets the course of actions in most of the cases. And among all elites judicial elites are of paramount importance. In india it's judicial elite which has been responsible for killing of democratic credentials.     And when elite fails masses step in and then elite becomes useless. Farmers movement is it's example. Success of farmers mov is not less than a revolution.