MORAL QUESTIONS OF LOCKDOWN.
Has the State or any other institution or person the right, according to any law or lesson of morality, to deprive other person or group of persons of the right to life without due process of law ? Or to deprive a person or a group of persons from the essential necessities of living? And does the essential necessity of living include only food or does it include anything more than food? Another related question is whether any government, institution or person can deprive any other person or group of persons from their employment which they have already without any due process? Whether the right to life of a person does not include the right to life of the members of that person's family to the extent that those members of his family are dependent on him for their livelihood, as if the livelihood of a person is taken away lives of the dependents come under threat of extinction?
These are a few moral questions that are morally obligatory to be solved before imposition of any kind of lockdown, which is to be imposed for a longer than normal period,.
. Their answers are also mandatory under the constitutional scheme of Fundamental Rghts system. These are the questions for which any authority must be made accountable by the society and the court, otherwise there will only be an increase in the gross inequality which is already in the favor of the wealthy class. This will in turn accelerate social instability as well as cultural, economic and political will increase. There will do the heinous task of increasing instability in the society.