Interestingly enough entire indian middle and upper class intellingtsia has consciously been refraining from raising the question about the absolute power of the government which is trying to exercise over the citizens. We can't see Farm laws and CAA just from the spectacles of crony capitalism and fanatic nationalism. Bigger and more philosophical questions are involved that how much power a govt can exercise over the citizens? Have the elected legislatures, the appointed executive and the selected judiciary unlimited powers to rule over the popular will or even the minority will? Have they absolute power to scuttle individual will so thoroughly that they can make, execute and justify any rule without the respect for individual liberty and community will? From where are they drawing such absolute power? Does our Constitution give unqualified right to them to overrule the citizens' will and their liberty ? These are a few fundamental questions which the Indian middle and upper class intelligentsia is consciously avoiding on the one hand and on the other hand Indian left is so naive that it's not capable of framing these fundamental questions to corner the government and it's wings.
Interestingly the govt and it's supporters ,and even the judiciary are advertising the very crude and obscene ideology that anything done by the majority enjoying govt is justified merely on the ground of numbers. Their idea of rule is that once they have got major share of seats in legislature they are all competent to make any rule of their desire. But contrary to this idea the reality of democracy is more concerned about individual and community than the govt itself. Majority has undoubtedly a licence to rule but majority is not a permit allowing the govt to do any thing that might be contrary to individual's basic rights to life and liberty. We need to examine this question more deeply and this question allows us to go beyond any limit put by any law to find answers. But the most pathological ailment in our system is the procedure of selection of judiciary which is not only arbitrary but also leads to corrupt ways for adjudication.