Skip to main content

CHANGES REQUIRED IN BUREAUCRACY IN POST CIVID INDIA

What reforms are needed in the field of administration in post covid 19 India? A good question deserves to be asked. In Indian where  bereaucracy is all encompassing and where every citizen has to depend upon bereaucracy  for some one or other need and where the performance of bereaucracy has been under question in the era of Covid 19 it's very natural such questions will be asked by common citizen.
         Let's try to examine. And we will try to examine the issue in its own context only because if we take a slightest freedom there will be vast distraction from our original topic of discussion. In India at present the top bereaucracy consists of IAS & IPS followed by State Civil & Police Services. For the sake of discussion we are going to confine ourselves to the domain of civil services only where there is a separate bereaucratic framework for the center and the states although personnel of IAS can be shifted to and fro after following certain criteria. This top brass is followed by State Civil Services which are state specific though mobility from state to central sevices is possible after complying with certain provisions with the consultation of the UPSC. The ease of this mobility varies from state to state. Now it's pertinent to note that the entire permanent bereaucracy works under political bosses i.e. the ministers and the ultimate head is the Prime Minister at the center for IAS and the Chief Minster in the state for the State Civil Services and for IAS working in that state . The State Civil Services and their cader officers are mainly responsible for carrying out the programmes and schemes of the governments under the general supervision and control of their IAS bosses who are responsible for devising policies and  who ultimately are supervised and controlled by the Departmental Ministers and the PM or the CM as the case may be. Besides these structures there are horizontal branches of Line Departments as those of education, health , education, engineering, agriculture etc which also have to work under the control and supervision of the IAS bosses of the  district and the department. 
       Now we have to examine whether this framework  is working properly or not. For arriving at any definite conclusion we must have detail data collected from research works  done by independendet actors like university professionals, management institutes and NGOs. In want of any concrete data conclusions arrived at will always be debatable and different interest groups will provide their own  unverified data to support their cases. So the first and foremost thing required to be done is to set up research and survey groups consisting of universities' professional researchers, top management institutes' professionals  and surveyers and others, but not of bereaurats themselves to examine whether this system of present bereaucratic structure is performing properly or not and if yes then why it is being questioned for its performance or if no then what can be done to restructure the system and what can be done to equip the entire bureaucracy with modern technology based on internet and artificial intelligence. Such research groups must be formed wirh state-center coordination and such groups must include state level experts, and scholars of national and international repute and technological experts and such groups must be provided a time frame and all logistics needed. But there must not be any political or bereaucratic interference and this must be it's pre condition. 
            Now time has come when we must start thinking and doing something long lasting for bereaucratic reforms. But such changes call for scientific study and whims of anyone  can't be allowed to dictate the changes as per his or her wishes .

For today this is sufficient. In our next exploration we'll try to spot some lacunae and their solurions on the basis of the experiences and heuristics of those working in this field.

Popular posts from this blog

SHRIMADBHAGAVAD GEETA CHAPTER 2 SHLOKA 47

गीता अध्याय 2 श्लोक 47 ----------------------------------- कर्मण्येवाधिकारस्ते मा फलेषु कदाचन।  मा कर्मफलहेतुर्भुर्मा ते संगोऽस्त्वकर्मणि॥ तेरा कर्म करने में ही अधिकार है, उसके फलों में कभी नहीं। इसलिए तू कर्मों के फल हेतु मत हो तथा तेरी कर्म न करने में भी आसक्ति न हो  ॥47॥ कर्मपथ की सावधानियों और विशेषताओं को बताते हुए श्रीकृष्ण इस पथ के सम्बंध में समझाये हैं कि अन्तिम लक्ष्य तो साँख्य बुद्धि को प्राप्त करना है लेकिन उस तक पहुंचने का मार्ग योग है, कर्मपथ है। इस पथ को ध्यान पूर्वक समझना और उसका अभ्यास करना बहुत जरूरी है तभी हम साँख्य और उसके पश्चात परमब्रह्म को प्राप्त कर सकते हैं। इसके अतिरिक्त कोई और रास्ता नहीं है जो हमारेके कल्याण का मार्ग प्रशस्त कर सके।        श्रीकृष्ण समझते हुए कहते हैं कि कर्म ही वो मार्ग है जिसपर हम चलकर के परम नैष्कर्म्य की स्थिति तक पहुँच सकते हैं लेकिन जब हम कर्म करते हैं तो उस कर्म की विशेषता और सावधानियों को समझना अनिवार्य है अन्यथा हम कर्मपथ से भटक जाते हैं।       ये विशेषताएँ और सावधानियाँ निम्नवत हैं----- 1....

श्रीमद्भागवत गीता-प्रवेशिका से सारांश तक

श्रीमद्भागवत गीता-प्रवेशिका से सारांश तक-- श्रीमद्भागवत गीता की शुरुआत महाभारत का युद्ध वास्तविक रूप से शूरु होने के ठीक पहले होती है और इसके अंत के साथ युद्ध प्रारम्भ होता है। तो क्या गीता युद्ध को उकसाने वाला ग्रंथ है?      इस प्रश्न का उत्तर द्वितीय अध्याय की शुरुआत में ही मिल जाता है। प्रथम अध्याय के अंत में अर्जुन हथियार डाल देता है, साफ साफ मना कर देता है कि वो अपने अंग्रजो, अनुजों, गुरुओं, बंधुओं से नहीं लड़ेगा।।सनद रहे वो डरा नहीं था, उसे  विषाद  हो गया था, वो डिप्रेशन में चला गया था। उस समय उसे उकसाने का सबसे सरल तरीका क्या  हो सकता था? कृष्ण उसे जुआ यानी चौसर की सभा याद दिलाते, द्रौपदी का वस्त्रहरण याद दिलाते, लाक्षागृह याद दिलाते, वनवास के दिन याद दिलाते। तब ज्यादा सम्भावना थी कि अर्जुन हिंसक हो कर युद्ध के लिए ततपर हो उठता। लेकिन तब अर्जुन हिंसक होता, उसमें और कौरवों में कोई फर्क नहीं रह जाता। जैसे को तैसा होता । लेकिन कृष्ण ने उसे आत्मा की अजरता, कर्तव्यबोध, धर्म, कर्म के विषय में बताया। एक बार भी प्रतिशोध की आग नहीं भड़काई उन्होंने, बल्कि उसे सत...
It's a hard fact that more than common masses it's the elite, which ditches idea of India as enshrined in the Indian National Movement and in  the  Indian  Constitution. Role of the judiciaal elite in this context has been more objectionable considering the weight of onus she has to carry to carry on the democracy.     It's the elite which sets the course of actions in most of the cases. And among all elites judicial elites are of paramount importance. In india it's judicial elite which has been responsible for killing of democratic credentials.     And when elite fails masses step in and then elite becomes useless. Farmers movement is it's example. Success of farmers mov is not less than a revolution.